This article from the experts at LexisNexis® Practical Guidance, covers the most significant legal reforms in 2024 and further changes in 2025 that we’re watching closely. This year’s developments have...
Introduction The 29th Conference of the Parties (COP29) to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) took place in Baku, Azerbaijan, from 11 to 24 November 2024, concluding 35 hours after...
Over the past several years, there has been a seismic shift in shareholder and stakeholder expectations as to how businesses manage climate risk along with increasing pressure for companies to provide...
As Australia undergoes significant changes to its privacy laws, it’s crucial for businesses of all sizes to prepare. Following a multi-year review, the government is proposing amendments to the Privacy...
Writer: John Darmanin, Practical Guidance Senior Legal Writer – Property module The COVID-19 pandemic is affecting economies all over the world and GDP growth among OECD countries slowed to 0.7% in the...
The last few years have seen extended public outcry over what appears to be systemic wage theft in Australia. In response to the ongoing underpayment of wages, the Fair Work Ombudsman has beefed up its enforcement priorities, with - among other things - Company Directors now significantly liable and a range of civil and criminal remedies at its disposal.
Before the arrival of COVID-19, there was strong community support and political momentum behind the idea that the FWO needed to send a strong message of deterrence to would-be lawbreakers. During the 2019-20 financial year Fair Work Ombudsman (FWO) recovered $123 million in unpaid wages for over 25,000 workers and dealt with a significant increase in unfair dismissal and general protections applications.
However, with Australia and the world engulfed in the current health and economic crisis, it is far less clear as to which way the regulatory pendulum will to swing.
Tess Hardy, Senior Lecturer at Melbourne Law School states “wage theft is now perceived as seriously troubling from a political, social, economic and regulatory perspective” in the article Trivial to Troubling: The Evolution of Enforcement under the Fair Work Act.
Read the full journal article from Australian Journal of Labour Law HERE.
In the early years of the Fair Work Act, employer noncompliance with employment standards regulation was perceived as relatively benign, if not trivial.
With sweeping industrial relations reforms in the early-mid 2000s that - for the most part - left businesses with a stronger position in relation to their workers, the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (the Act) sought to broaden and clarify the powers of the federal statutory body now known as the Fair Work Ombudsman (FWO). The Act did this without providing much increase or change to the enforcement options, maximum penalties and liability limits that had been in place for many years prior.
However, the tide turned in 2015 in response to number of high profile underpayment scandals - perhaps the most notable of these being the 2015 7-Eleven case - the term ‘wage theft’ entered the common lexicon and the FWO faced immense public pressure over what appeared to be systemic mistreatment of vulnerable workers in some sectors.
While industrial relations changes represented a significant step forward, practical constraints such as funding and resourcing limited the FWO’s ability to create the sort of change that was required. Driven by Governmental pressure for efficiency, the Office of the FWO focused only on ‘serious’ cases, exposing it to allegations that it was failing vulnerable workers and that those contravening the Act were doing so largely with impunity.
The Fair Work Amendment (Protecting Vulnerable Workers) Act 2017 (Cth), vastly extended liability and raised the maximum penalties for ‘serious contraventions’ of the Act. Among the changes were the extension of liability for breaches to franchisors and holding companies in certain circumstances, the introduction of statutory presumptions for failure to provide adequate employment records, or falsified records, and the further strengthening of the investigative powers of the FWO.
In 2019 a new Compliance and Enforcement Policy was launched by the FWO which focuses more on the FWO’s statutory powers, and less on other novel initiatives. It also sets out criteria for when the FWO will launch an investigation or commence litigation.
Under this regime, the FWO engages in specific enforcement practices and outcomes, which can be grouped as below.
“Following the 7-Eleven underpayment scandal… there has been, and continues to be, a sense that there is now an enforcement crisis.”
–Tess Hardy, Senior Lecturer, Melbourne Law School, University of Melbourne.
There is an ongoing debate across jurisdictions about whether serious underpayment contraventions should be classed as criminal contraventions. Some states such as Victoria, Queensland and Western Australia have passed, or are in the process of passing wage theft crime bills.
In Victoria, the Wage Theft Bill was passed in June 2020 (with the Act to commence in 2021) and provides for three wage theft offences:
Victorian companies will be vicariously liable for actions taken by officers, directors, associates and agents within their scope of employment or engagement, and there will be “implied authority” if there is a corporate culture of “wage theft”. Decision-makers will be liable if they fail to take reasonable precautions, which includes exercising due diligence.
Maximum penalties for these offences are 6000 penalty units ($991,320) for corporates and 1200 penalty units ($198,264) and 10 years’ imprisonment for individuals. If determined summarily in the Victorian Magistrates Court, the maximum fine is 2500 penalty units ($413,050). A penalty unit was $165.22, as at 1 July 2019, however this will shortly increase.
Read more here: Victoria criminalises Wage theft (inside Practical Guidance, Lexis Advance subscribers only.)
In Queensland, amendments to the Criminal Code in the Criminal Code and Other Legislation (Wage Theft) Amendment Bill 2020 were recently passed with the Queensland Parliament's bi-partisan support.
The FWO and its powers under the Act exist to protect workers but must do so while tenuously balancing the desires of the Government at the time and while also appearing tough on contraveners, without coming off as anti-business or too draconian.
It seems these competing pressures will not be abating any time soon and thus we may see further changes to both the remit of the FWO, and the structure of its Enforcement and Compliance Policy, in the near future.
STAY AHEAD OF THE DEBATE WITH LEXIS ADVANCE
Contact your Relationship Manager today to subscribe to our Workplace and Employment Law titles within Lexis Advance. Alternatively, contact Sales.Enquiries@lexisnexis.com.au or call us on 1800 772 772 to request a complimentary trial of Lexis Advance.
Lexis Advance®
From simple search to analysis and insight, the powerful intelligence of Lexis Advance sits at the heart of many of LexisNexis legal solutions.